Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00249
Original file (BC 2014 00249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

	
IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00249

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active 
Duty, be amended to reflect the National Defense Service Medal 
(NDSM).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Per the Department of Defense (DOD) instructions, he is entitled 
to the NDSM and it should be reflected on his DD Form 214.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 18 Oct 11, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the 
Regular Air Force.

On 31 Jan 12, the applicant underwent a Medical Evaluation Board 
(MEB).  The MEB diagnosed the applicant with ANCA-Associated 
Vasculitis and a referred his case to the Informal Physical 
Evaluation Board (IPEB).

On 27 Feb 12, the IPEB reviewed the applicant’s case and 
recommend he be found unfit with a ten percent disability rating 
and discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay.  On 
29 Feb 12, the applicant concurred with the findings and 
recommendations of the IPEB.

On 6 Mar 12, the Secretary of the Air Force directed the 
applicant be separated for a physical disability with severance 
pay.  On 9 Mar 12, the applicant was honorably discharged with a 
narrative reason or separation of “Disability, Severance Pay, 
Non-Combat Related,” along with a reentry code of 2Q (Personnel 
medically retired or discharged).  He was credited with 4 months 
and 22 days of active service.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The NDSM is awarded for honorable 
active service as a member of the Armed Forces of the United 
States for any period 27 Jun 50 to 27 Jul 54, 1 Jan 61 to 
14 Aug 74, 2 Aug 90 to 30 Nov 95, and 11 Sep 01 to a date to be 
determined.  Per AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Awards and 
Decorations Program, members of the Armed Forces, to include the 
Coast Guard, who are on active duty, members of the selected 
Reserve in Good standing, members of other than the Selected 
Reserve call to active duty, cadets, and members who have 
completed Air Force Basic Training are eligible for the NDSM.  
Although the applicant served on active duty during an 
authorized period for the NDSM, he was medically discharged 
prior to completing basic military training; thus, rendering him 
ineligible for the medal.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 28 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00249 in Executive Session on 27 Jan 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 Jan 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 24 Mar 14.
        Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14.

						




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03313

    Original file (BC 2014 03313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official military records reflect his Vietnam Service and Vietnam/Southeast Asia Service Ribbons. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), attached at Exhibit C and Exhibit D. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02223

    Original file (BC 2014 02223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02223 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to allow reentry in the military. On 20 Mar 09, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) reviewed the case file with medical records and determined the ulcerative colitis was unfitting with a disability rating of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02126

    Original file (BC 2014 02126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice noting the applicant underwent his first periodic reexamination and was found fit and was removed from TDRL. On 13 Mar 13, the applicant was removed from the TDRL with the reentry code of 3K which allows the service member to be eligible to enlist in any branch of the service. If the medical condition has improved or stabilized, the service member could receive permanent disability...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00350

    Original file (BC 2014 00350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the 99 ABW Commander’s letter dated 4 Dec 13, she was issued a written no-contact order on 8 Feb 13 by the First Sergeant to stay away from another member of the 99 LRS per a request from Security Forces investigators because the applicant was discussing the open investigation with the said person. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 28 Jul 14, copies of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03317

    Original file (BC-2012-03317.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was forced to accept the findings and recommendations of his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) even though he did not agree with them. On 20 Jul 10, the applicant initialed the following statement on his AF Form 1180, Action on IPEB Finding and Recommended Disposition, “I agree with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB and am waiving the right to a formal PEB hearing.” On 21 Jul 10, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02678

    Original file (BC 2013 02678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02678 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following items on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 29 Apr 11 placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) be changed so that he can reenter the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03737

    Original file (BC 2013 03737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFGCM is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel during a three-year period of active military service or for a one-year period of service during a time of war. Service members who earned the medal during the first qualifying period and who again became entitled to the medal wear a bronze star on the ribbon to denote the second award of the medal. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant award of the VSM, VCM,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01972

    Original file (BC 2014 01972.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Further, it must be noted that the USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the member’s condition at the time of evaluation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s disability/medical discharge. A complete copy of the AFBCMR Clinical Psychology Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01116

    Original file (BC 2014 01116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members must be permanently assigned or attached by official orders to the joint unit receiving the JMUA. The Services may award appropriate Service unit awards to their units assigned and/or attached to a JTF. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: She provides the Joint Staff permanent order number J-1SO-0246- 12 announcing the award of the JMUA to Headquarters USCENTCOM from 2 Jul 10 to 31 Jul 12 as well as several copies of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02365

    Original file (BC 2012 02365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a three-page response, the applicant reiterates much of his earlier contentions. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the Department Veteran’s Affairs (DVA) rated his Crohn’s...